Solutions by Industry

Automotive Industry

Handling the defects rule-based inspection cannot catch

Questions this page answers

  • Can AI detect hard-to-catch defects in injection molding?
  • What are the limits of rule-based vision inspection?
  • How is AI inspection introduced to an automotive parts production line?

Requirements in this industry

  • Injection molding
  • Hard-to-detect defects
  • Machine vision
  • PPM management
  • Mold conditions
  • Mass production quality

The hard-to-catch defect problem

In automotive parts production the difficult cases are not the obvious defects but the ambiguous ones — flaws sitting on the specification boundary, scratches that appear and disappear depending on lighting and angle.

Rule-based vision cameras struggle here. Tighten the threshold and good parts get scrapped; loosen it and defects slip through. People end up re-inspecting, and inspection headcount becomes the bottleneck.

Two directions

Detection — catching what gets missed

Deep learning vision inspection (V²) detects fine defects that rule-based systems miss. Using anomaly detection trained only on images of good parts means it can be applied early, before enough defect samples have accumulated. The models are light enough to run on edge devices, so line speed is unaffected.

Prevention — reducing the conditions that create defects

Detection alone does not lower the defect rate. Linking process variables such as molding conditions, mold temperature and material lot to actual quality results shows which conditions raise defect rates. Adjusting the process to avoid those conditions is the more fundamental fix.

Rollout

Validate on one line, then extend to other lines running the same process. Because equipment and conditions differ between lines, models rarely transfer unchanged, so a retraining procedure is designed alongside the rollout.

Solutions applied

Related use cases